|
|
get notice of diary updates | |
24 april 02 |
Roger Tory Peterson's Retreat at Risk? |"He spent the last years of his life in Old Lyme [Connecticut], working on field guides and illusrations ...by the headwaters of the Lieutenant River. His studio ...sat by the river's west branch. Just beyond is a steep bluff that slopes toward the tidal marshes below. Submerged aquatic vegetation, wild rice and cattails grow there. The not-so-extinct snowy egret lives there, poking its black bill into the mucky shore." 1 Now Peterson's retreat [approximately 60 acres] is up for sale to a developer who wants to put houses atop the steep bluff where osprey once nested. Nature Conservancy's Tidelands chapter would like to save the 1 from "Peterson's Perspective" an article by Jane Dee published in the Sunday Hartford Courant 4/21/02 | click pix at right for info on guidebooks and a Peterson bio ---->> |
naturalist's retreat for all to enjoy. Nature Conservancy is getting closer to the asked for sale price of the acreage | While the state of Connecticut has already designated an island in the middle to the Connecticut River with Peterson's name to recognize is work, how fitting that his own retreat could be added to this, and how equally fitting that ordinary citizens would be able to access that retreat.
Other sites that tell more about RT Peterson's life work: Evolution of a Field Guide Nature Conservancy's preservation effort land preservation victory! | It's been many years, but with TAHOE-SIERRA PRESERVATION COUNCIL, INC. v. TAHOE REG'L PLANNING AGENCY, the US Supreme Court has ruled, with a clear majority, that developers don't have unfettered ability to do what they feel like doing when they please on lands to which they currently hold title. This single decision counters the arguement that when local zoning officials call for a moratorium on development to study the impacts of a developer's proposal constitutes a "Taking" of private land. Clearly this decision affirms that moratoria are not "takings" of private land. The decision will provide for small communities a powerful tool that supports a more thoughtful planning process. It may affirm that the interests of a larger community are more pertinent to decision-making than the whims and avarice of a handful of land speculators. I say "may" here since I am still reading the Court's formal opinion on the case. Not surprising, however, that three Court dinosaurs, Rhenquist, Scalia and Thomas, have objected to the findings of the other judges, still maintaining the artifice that anything that holds back rapacious practices of the few ought to be held sacrosanct above the interests of the many. Just in case there are nagging doubts here regarding my own perspective, it ought come as no surprise that I fall in the camp of folks who maintain that no one of us owns anything! We are entrusted with the use of virtually everything that is placed in our personal possession while we are alive. With regard to the use of land, buildings, natural resources, art treasures and artifacts, it is incumbent upon each of us to handle our trust responsibly, for after we die, that trust is bestowed upon some one else. It would be immoral of us to have squandered what we were entrusted with. Plain and simple. This does not mean I am anti-development. To the contrary. Responsible growth is important and necessary for all of us. But growth for the personal betterment of some at the expense of many, is motivated by selfishness and greed. When development is propelled by those two attributes, the end result is often harmful, and can take, sometimes centuries to remedy. Humanity cannot afford that kind of development. Anyway, enough preaching. The full text (58 pages once printed out0 of the Supreme Court's Decision has been posted on the FindLaw website as TAHOE-SIERRA PRESERVATION COUNCIL, INC. v. TAHOE REG'L PLANNING AGENCY. You'll need Adobe Acrobat to read it. PBS panel to discuss John NashYeah, this is kind of a repeat, but it hasn't happened yet, so I'm pitching it again. On Sunday, April 28, 2002, the USA public broadcasting service will air a television show about John Nash, whose life was featured in the popular film "A Beautiful Mind." | One of the panelists, radical pro-forced treatment psychiatrist E. Fuller Torrey, was on CBS' 60 Minutes last Sunday | It was an interesting piece; filled in part with well founded critiques which identified shortcomings with NIMH and other government funding iniatives as well as lambasting society for its shoddy treatment of people with "severe mental illnesses", but short on Torrey's extremist positions | Interviewed by Morley Safer, Torrey pulled an old grandstanding stunt of slamming NIMH (and others) for supporting frivolus "research." | He's on shakey ground there | After all, this is the guy who speculated (with on clinical studies to support his thesis) that Schizophrenia may be caused by exposure to viruses carried by house cats | This written when Torrey, himself, was an NIMH research fellow | Is this an example of the "pot calling the Kettle black" ? | You decide | I jsut wonder how much of taxpayer dollars he was rewarded to write this kind of thing | Back to Nash's show (where Professor Nash shall apparently be absent) PBS assures its audience that the show's presentation shall be balanced | PBS is inviting people to e-mail in questions | You can submit them now: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/nash/sfeature/sf_forum.html More later, out fer now. Will
internet access tools | Check out the 10 march 2002 entry for tools to help make better use of Iternet resources | MOST RECENT ESSAY: ECONOMIC TREASON: Do travesties like ENRON make your blood boil? There's a new discussion group on the Yahoo Groups website. It's still new, so the discussion has just begun. Participants are welcome. Stop by, sign up, and add your POV. |
will brady's
>online< journal
will brady's >online< journal | favorite pages | site contents | What's up with this? | write me | soon: abo culture web essayists search engines iTools all the web scrub the web altavista northern light plague you with cookies or pop-up adverts but still okay to use dogpile yahoo hotbot
LEGAL & DISCLAIMER NOTICE:
© 1999 - 2002 / Will Brady I hope you've found this site interesting, even thought provoking || Occasionally some images come from commercial sources and are reproduced here under fair use guidelines of US Copyright law || Please don't write to me about the content of other peoples' sites linked from here || On the other hand, please let me know of any inactive links || Constructive comments, suggested links to add, are welcome. * ABOUT THE "PIX OF THE DAY": Each "day" I present a new image from my own work. The image may or may not be relevant to the text the is next to it. The purpose is more to show off my work. Call this shameless self-promotion or whatever. Hope you like them. This website is maintained by Will Brady / wbrady@rondak.org / Last update: see most recent entry On many sites from which this one connects, you'll need ACROBAT READER to read a variety of documents and bulletins | If you don't have it, click on the logo below and get it. It's free! |